Macro Trends in COVID-19 Litigation

by lm-admin
on June 15, 2020

By Richard Lau, Manager, Production, LegalMation

Given the massive social and economic damage that is occurring and expected to occur due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is little surprise that COVID-19 has already driven a large amount of litigation. Despite court shutdowns and closures, the actual number of cases filed in federal district courts nationwide has not dropped.[1] Rather it has just shifted, with the vast majority of these cases consisting of either contract or insurance-based COVID-19 cases. As discussed below, these claims comprise 78.7% of all coronavirus-related matters. This article provides a brief snapshot of the current state of litigation related to the COVID-19 pandemic and likely trends that will continue once all courts reopen.

Contracts

Not surprisingly, over the last few months there was a major spike in litigation where the defendant was unable to perform under a contract due to the pandemic. According to Lex Machina, contract cases represented far more COVID-19-related cases than any other practice area, comprising 44.6% of all COVID-19-related cases filed in federal court between March 1 and May 2, 2020.[2]

A sampling of these cases shows that they usually involve the plaintiff seeking a refund for products or services that were not provided due to the COVID-19 pandemic shutdowns and quarantines. Common examples include plaintiffs seeking a refund of tuition (for classes cancelled due to the pandemic), gym memberships (for gyms shut down due to social distancing orders), and tickets for conventions, concerts, or music festivals that were cancelled. There are also a significant number of lawsuits seeking a declaratory judgment (either in suit or countersuit) that performance of the contract is impossible or asserting the applicability of a force majeure clause due to the pandemic.[3]

We expect that the volume in this area will continue to grow while quarantine and other social distancing orders are in place, as defendants will continue to be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations. This trend may be disrupted, however, as jurisdictions start to set precedents for whether force majeure provisions apply to, or the doctrine of impossibility can be leveraged for, the COVID-19 pandemic.

Insurance

The next largest area of COVID-19-related litigation is insurance, which comprises 34.1% of all COVID-19-related cases. Unlike COVID-19-related contract cases that cover a variety of subject matters, insurance cases are more homogeneous: they almost universally involve a business attempting to invoke a business interruption provision of its insurance policy.[4] A number of businesses were deemed nonessential and shuttered by various state, county, and city shutdown orders. These nonessential businesses (covering everything from nail salons to dentists) with business interruption insurance could potentially have a claim if the pandemic meets the terms of their policy.

Two key developments lead us to believe, however, that the volume of COVID-19-related insurance litigation will slow in the coming months. First, multidistrict litigation is currently pending as to whether business interruption policies are covered by COVID-19-induced shutdown orders.[5] Due to the homogeneity of facts in these lawsuits, a decision in one will likely set precedents that will either foreclose future claims or encourage insurers to pay out claims without litigation. Second, many state legislatures are attempting to address this specific question via legislation. State legislators in Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina have all introduced legislation that will require business interruption policies to cover COVID-19-related closures for small business claimants.[6] The pendency of this legislation may cause businesses in these states to wait to bring suit in anticipation of the adoption of their state’s legislation.

Employment

Employment cases comprised only 6.6% of all COVID-related cases so far, yet we expect this area to have significant growth in the coming months as unemployment continues to rise and state courts reopen. The current batch of COVID-related employment cases fit broadly into two categories: 1) an employee who was let go or had hours reduced in response to the pandemic claiming wrongful termination or unpaid wages; or 2) an employee who became sick or was exposed to COVID-19 due to unsafe working conditions.[7]

Wrongful termination and reduced pay suits arise when either the employee is let go due to a business reduction as a result of COVID-19 or when the employee is let go because he or she is suspected of having COVID-19 or being an asymptomatic carrier of COVID-19. The plaintiffs in the former type of cases are relying heavily on the Fair Labor Standards Act, while plaintiffs in the latter cases are using some novel strategies. The most notable of these strategies attempt to characterize asymptomatic carriers as disabled and, therefore, entitled to reasonable accommodations under the Family Medical Leave Act/Americans with Disability Act.

As noted above, we anticipate a strong rise in litigation in this area for several reasons. First, as with insurance litigation, various legislatures have attempted to preempt the question by creating COVID-19-related statutory protections. Most significant of these attempts is the U.S. Congress passing the Families First Coronavirus Act, and the Emergency Family Medical Leave Act. As these provisions become active, they will create new causes of actions against employers. Moreover, there are almost certainly numerous potential lawsuits where the plaintiff is waiting for standing to accrue or the courts to reopen. For example, a recently fired employee may need to wait until damages are more calculable before filing.

Medical

Surprisingly, there have been relatively few cases directly related to a plaintiff’s health or malpractice for their treatment. We expect that there will be a significant increase in this area as the initial uncertainty and chaos from the pandemic resolves and individuals and families are able to reevaluate their treatment and review guidelines and procedures issued by various medical authorities.

It would not be surprising to see an influx of these types of personal injury and tort claims as plaintiffs realize they may have been harmed.

What’s Next?

While we feel fairly confident in our predictions as to which practice areas will start or continue to see significant amounts of COVID-related litigation, there is a lot we still do not know and need to pay attention to as events develop. Over the next few months, as courts reopen and people attempt to return to normalcy, we will be able to get a much better picture of how COVID-19-related litigation will impact the legal system. As a vaccine is predicted to be at least 12 months away and the statutes of limitations for COVID-19-related claims can be up to 4-years, we expect the pandemic to have a significant impact for at least the next 5 years.

[1] In re: COVID-19 Business Interruption Insurance Coverage Litigation, No 90 before the USJML.

[2] “States Begin to Introduce Legislation: Business Interruption Policies Would Be Required to Cover COVID-19-Related Claims” https://www.venable.com/insights/publications/2020/04/states-begin-to-introduce-legislation-business

[3] See, e.g., “Coronavirus Coverage Litigation: the Week in Review” for weeks between April 17 to May 22 in Law 360.

[4] https://lexmachina.com/ongoing-impacts-of-the-coronavirus-on-litigation-activity-in-federal-district-court/

[5] https://lexmachina.com/tracking-new-litigation-caused-by-covid-19/

[6] See, e.g., “Coronavirus Coverage Litigation: the Week in Review” for weeks between April 17 to May 22 in Law 360.

[4] See, e.g., “Coronavirus Coverage Litigation: the Week in Review” for 7eeks between April 17 to May 22 in Law 360.

Contact Us

Careers

You want to work at LegalMation because XYZ. Check out our open positions below and join our team.

Platform Overview

LegalMation provides a suite of Artificial Intelligence tools to help litigation attorneys and legal professionals practice at their highest levels. Our litigation automation solutions tackle routine litigation tasks. Unlike existing template generators and form-fillers, LegalMation's ground-breaking AI system is able to dynamically produce responsive pleadings, discovery requests, discovery responses, and related documents that are tailored to the claims, allegations, and requests in the legal document uploaded, incorporating jurisdictional requirements as well as the attorney’s own style, formatting, and response strategy.

Our litigation analytics solution uncovers deep insights into our customers' own data (the data sitting underneath the surface), drilled down to granular data points, previously not possible. The impact? Our solution fundamentally transforms how cases are assigned, budgeted, settled, pitched, and much much more.

Developed by a passionate group of award-winning litigators and highly accomplished software developers, LegalMation is focused on liberating litigators to allow them to focus on more valuable tasks in their practice.

LegalMation distinguishes itself from other Artificial Intelligence products in several key aspects.:

LegalMation is the first Artificial Intelligence company to focus solely on using AI to automate and enhance litigation tasks.
LegalMation uses cutting-edge AI to power its platform and, unlike some other legal tech platforms, LegalMation requires no human involvement to generate its output.
LegalMation's automation solution is not a template generator, form-filler, or other Q&A-driven tool. Rather, our A.I. solutions generate actual work product--caliber drafts of legal documents comparable to that of an attorney or legal professional that only require minor editing and basic review before filing/serving. Drafting these documents from scratch often takes an associate attorney or paralegal an entire day, but our products can produce comparable high-quality drafts in mere minutes.
LegalMation's analytics solution, takes an entirely different approach to data analytics. Our proprietary solution ingests a company or law firm's own existing data (billing, case results, etc.) and provides deep insights down to granular levels previously not possible. Unlike publicly available statistics, we believe our customer's own data provides truly actionable insights. After all, less than 5% of case results are publicly available.
LegalMation’s solutions are fully customizable to our customers' needs.
LegalMation’s solutions are easy to use and require no computer knowledge besides how to use a mouse and keyboard. Our products are browser-based; there is nothing to download or install. The interface is simple and clean, and designed to be accessible to even the least tech-savvy. As a result, the adoption cost for integrating LegalMation to an existing organization's workflow is very, very low.

Corporate In-House Case Study

A leading global retail giant achieves significant savings on legal fees on its high-volume litigation matters using LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool.

The Legal Operations group of a leading global retailer with significant litigation volume across the country was searching for technology tools to increase efficiency and consistency on its litigation matters, lower its legal spend, and obtain more value from outside counsel. Working with LegalMation, the retailer identified two litigation areas with large volume where the deployment of LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool could have a significant impact: employment and premises liability tort litigation.

The retailer conducted a pilot of LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool by asking select outside counsel to run complaints through the LegalMation Complaint Analysis tool and compare the outputs to those generated by the firm’s typical workflow. LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool was able to generate an answer, requests for production and interrogatories that were almost identical to those generated by outside counsel and tailored to the facts and allegations of each.

Today, this global retailer has made LegalMation an integral part of its workflow and case assignment process. When a new lawsuit is served on the retailer in one of the jurisdictions where LegalMation operates, an in-house paralegal runs the complaint through LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool and sends the output, consisting of an answer, requests for production, interrogatories, and other jurisdiction or firm-specific output to the selected outside counsel for the matter. Outside counsel then bills the retailer solely for the time spent reviewing and editing this initial output which generates significant savings for the global retailer.

Challenge

Increasing budgetary pressure to lower outside counsel legal fees
Obtain more value from hours billed by outside counsel
Lack of consistency in work product and quality from outside counsel

Solution

Deploy LegalMation internally to generate initial draft responsive documents in minutes
Integrate LegalMation into its initial case assignment process

Results

Up to 80% savings on outside counsel legal fees on key early stage litigation document drafting.
Reallocation of outside counsel time away from process/routine work to higher value strategic tasks.
Increased consistency and quality in work product

Large Firm Case Study

An Am Law 100 labor and employment law firm was searching for ways to become more competitive and capture more market share

Handling over 5,000 employment related litigation matters per year across the country, the Am Law 100 law firm (the “Firm”) needed a quantifiable solution to lower its servicing costs and provide more value to its national clients. The Firm engaged in extensive testing of LegalMation’s platform across multiple offices to determine its effectiveness.

Using LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool, the Firm was able to reduce the attorney time spent preparing answers, affirmative defenses, and initial written discovery (requests for production, interrogatories, and other jurisdiction-specific requests) from an average of 6-8 hours per matter, to less than 1 hour (including review time by an attorney). The Firm tested LegalMation’s tools across multiple types of employment cases across various jurisdictions and concluded that the resulting draft documents were not only produced incredibly fast, but were also consistent in quality.

Today, the Firm is able to offer more competitive proposals for its volume matters, which in turn allows it to obtain additional work from national clients.

Challenge

Downward price pressure in high-volume, lower-exposure matters
Making Alternative Fee Arrangements more competitive and yet more profitable
Differentiate from competitors during marketing pitches
Lack of work product consistency from associates/paralegals

Solution

Integrate LegalMation into volume litigation matters in the Firm’s busiest offices

Results

Up to 80% time savings on key litigation tasks
Higher profit margins on volume matters, particularly those on AFAs
More distinctive marketing
Higher levels of associate satisfaction

SMALL LAW Firm Case Study

A high-caliber general litigation boutique reduced paralegal and associate time and money expended on key early litigation tasks by 75%+

A general litigation boutique with around 40 attorneys needed to cut costs in order to stay competitive in a very crowded local market and also sought to minimize reliance on support staff.

Using LegalMation’s platform, the boutique law firm was able to reduce the attorney (and paralegal) time spent preparing answers, initial discovery (requests for production and interrogatories), and discovery responses, including objections, from several hours per matter, to less than 1 hour (including review time by a supervising attorney). The boutique firm tested LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool and Discovery Analysis tool across multiple practice areas and concluded that the resulting draft documents were not only produced incredibly fast but also with consistency and quality similar to its own junior attorneys and paralegals. In particular, the boutique law frim, which did not have the luxury of a large support staff, found LegalMation’s Discovery Request tool particularly helpful in dealing with burdensome discovery requests served on its clients.

Today, the boutique law firm is able to offer more competitive proposals for its matters and through the efficiency gained by LegalMation’s platform compete against national law firms with more resources.

Challenge

Downward price pressure due to a crowded local market
Limited associate/paralegal resources to handle routine drafting tasks
Compete against national law firms with more resources
Differentiate from competitors during marketing pitches
Lack of work product consistency from associates/paralegals

Solution

Deploy LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool to generate initial draft responsive pleadings, and the Discovery Analysis tool to quickly generate shells and responsive objections throughout the life of a case

Results

70-85% time savings on key litigation tasks
Higher profit margins on volume matters, particularly those on AFAs
More distinctive marketing
Higher levels of associate satisfaction
Reduced staff overtime

Success Story

“Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam.

Ut enim ad minim veniam. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam.

Amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam.”

John Smith,
Company Name

James M. Lee

Co-Founder & CEO

James M. Lee is co-founder and CEO of LegalMation. He is a founding partner of LTL Attorneys LLP, a nationally recognized litigation boutique. As an experienced litigator, he has tried numerous cases in federal and state courts. He has been recognized as a top business litigator by various legal publications including the National Law Journal. James has served as lead counsel to a number of Fortune and multinational clients including Wal-Mart, Thomson Reuters, Symantec, and VIZIO. He was formerly associated with litigation powerhouse Quinn Emanuel before co-founding LTL Attorneys. He is a frequent and noted speaker and commentator in the field of AI and innovations in the field of law. He received his J.D. from Stanford Law School, and his B.S. from the University of Southern California. At LegalMation, James serves as the key driver of the Company’s vision and strategy.

Technical Support

Need help with LegalMation? We're here to assist.
Send us a quick note below and we'll be in touch right away.

You can also call us at (949) 662-1429, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. PST.

Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit Amet

Topic & name of speaker

Hosted by John Smith

1/25/19 @ 5pm PST

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Sign up for event notifications

Insurance COMPANY Case Study

A national insurance carrier achieves significant savings on its high-volume, low exposure litigation matters through its adoption of LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool

A national insurance carrier with significant litigation volume across the country for its insureds, was searching for technology, tools, and processes to increase efficiency on its litigation matters to lower its litigation costs. This national insurance carrier partnered with LegalMation to identify an area of litigation where LegalMation could have a significant and immediate impact and decided to deploy LegalMation’s Complaint Analysis tool for all of its third-party motor vehicle tort litigation.

LegalMation worked closely with the national insurance carrier to customize the output from its platform to generate documents that mirrored the current output of the national insurance carrier’s attorneys and paralegals. LegalMation was able to automate the creation of an answer, requests for production of documents, interrogatories, requests for admissions, and deposition notices, all tailored to the facts and allegations of each complaint and almost indistinguishable from those manually created by the insurance company’s attorneys and paralegals. LegalMation was able to generate this output in 2-3 minutes—a significant time savings over the insurance company’s prior practice for generating this output.

Following a pilot program consisting of processing all of its complaints for a single jurisdiction through LegalMation, the national insurance company made LegalMation an integral part of its workflow for all jurisdictions where LegalMation currently operates. In these jurisdictions, when a new motor vehicle-related lawsuit is served on the insurance company or its insureds, the assigned counsel or paralegal runs the complaint through the LegalMation Complaint Analysis tool, downloads the initial outputs, which are then reviewed by the attorney or paralegal and finalized, all within a few minutes.

Challenge

Increasing budgetary pressure to lower legal spend on defense of insureds
Obtain more value from staff counsel
Reduce legal secretary/paralegal overtime

Solution

Deploy LegalMation internally so staff/captive counsel can generate initial response draft documents in minutes

Results

Up to 80% time savings on key litigation tasks
Reallocation of staff/captive counsel time away from process/volume work to higher value strategic tasks
Increased consistency and quality in work product